H/HYDRA TOOLKIT
Demo data — all sites, partners and figures are fictional and illustrative. Not Hydra Host data.

DECISION SYSTEM

Site Qualification Scorecard

Edit weights and scores to test portfolio decisions in real time.

01 /

CRITERIA WEIGHTS

NORMALIZED 100%
Available & expandable MWGATING

5 = 100+ MW | 3 = 40–79 MW | 1 = <20 MW

20%
Time-to-energizationGATING

5 = <6 mo | 3 = 12–18 mo | 1 = >30 mo

18%
Rack density readiness

5 = 130kW+ | 3 = 80–100kW | 1 = <40kW

12%
Liquid-cooling readiness

5 = commissioned loop | 3 = designed | 1 = no path

12%
Fiber & carrier diversity

5 = 3+ diverse | 3 = 2 planned | 1 = single route

11%
Permitting & zoning risk

5 = by-right | 3 = routine hearing | 1 = contested

10%
Incentives

5 = executed | 3 = indicative | 1 = unavailable

7%
Financing / offtake fit

5 = fully aligned | 3 = term-sheet path | 1 = mismatch

10%

02 /

LIVE RANKING MATRIX

CLICK SITE FOR MEMO
SITEMWTIMEDENSITYCOOLINGFIBERPERMITINCENT.FINANCESCORERECOMMENDATION
Project MesquiteFICTIONAL
95GO
Project AlderFICTIONAL
93GO
Project IronwoodFICTIONAL
85GO
Project JuniperFICTIONAL
84GO
Project SaguaroFICTIONAL
84GO
Project TamarackFICTIONAL
81GO
Project BasaltFICTIONAL
79GO
Project PrairieFICTIONAL
72CONDITIONAL
Project CypressFICTIONAL
72CONDITIONAL
Project GraniteFICTIONAL
52NO-GO
Concept demo by Matthew Drewry. Not affiliated with or endorsed by Hydra Host. NVIDIA referenced only as a reference-architecture standard.ALL SITES · PARTNERS · PEOPLE · DATES · FIGURES ARE FICTIONAL